(22-11-2023) Arturo Vittori is delivering this water solution. It can be used to get water out of air in dry areas.

Click on the following link, scroll down and download the above study: 

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wpah-De-Vries.

Climate change is a scam

(22-11-2023) The science about climate change is not settled yet.

Click on the following link, scroll down and download the above study: 

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wpah-De-Vries

The TRUTH about carbon dioxide (CO2): Patrick Moore

(22-11-2023) Ecology is the science of how all living things are interrelated and how we are related to them) CO2 is responsible for the existence of every living thing on earth. It is a building block. (Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore, PhD is now "The Sensible Environmentalist," cutting through phony “global warming” science with facts. Here, he explains why carbon dioxide (C02) is a hero, not a villain). The science about climate change is not settled yet.

Click on the following link, scroll down and download the above study: 

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wpah-De-Vries.

Global warming is a blatant lie

(22-11-2023) In god we trust, all other sent us data. Sea level rise about 6 inches by 2100. Since the little Ice Age the sealevel has only risen 7 inches in the past century and is constant! There is no acidification of the ocean. The pH of the ocean is about 8,2. Climate changes all the time and it changes in cycles. The CO2 content in air is only 0,04% and that is almost nothing. The statement that 97% of all scientists think that CO2 is causing global warming is not based on any know fact. From a questionaire of a graduate student in Indiana of 10257 he got 3146 back. He handpicked 79(77). (75 : 3146 = 2)The actual number of consenses is 2% and not 98%. (time :1.07). Another petition project was signed by 31487 scientists. They think CO2 is NOT causing global warming. Among them 9000 with a PhD. Also they forget to talk about water vapor in the air, the concentration in the air is about 30000 ppm, (CO2 only 400 ppm and thats almost nothing).

Click on the following link, scroll down and download the above study: 

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wpah-De-Vries

(22-11-2023) Source Loehle 2008: Graphic global temperature This is different then the famous hockeystick graph of Michael Mann that later was proven wrong in 2006 by the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce. In the year 1000 you can see the higher temperatures in the middle ages and you can see the little ice age in 1600. According Øko Solutions Greenland was green in the year 1000 and cattle an humans could live there. Nowadays Greenland is covered with ice. It is easy to understand why the Vikings called this area Greenland. In England in the 17th century England was much colder then now. You can see it in a lot of dutch- and english paintings. Cooling and heating of the earth moves in natural cycles.

(22-11-2023) Al Gore made claims of "extreme weather" that will happen as CO2 rises - accelerating sea level rise, more droughts here, floods there, tornadoes, serious hurricanes (Katrina was timely), glaciers melting, ice-sheets cracking up, the Gulf Stream shutting down, heatwaves killing people, tropical diseases spreading, lakes drying out, polar bears dying out... all supposedly already happening and likely to getting worse through our global warming. He calls carbon dioxide a pollutant. Every single claim of An Inconvenient Truth is "cherrypicking", false, or otherwise critically misleading. The temperature leads CO2 by 800 years! He forgot to say this in his speech. The cause never comes before the effect in science!!!

(22-11-2023) Source: Michael Mann. Michael Mann's "Hockey Stick" graph was given great prominence in IPCC 2001; it was used by Al Gore. It shows temperature rising dramatically after 1000 years of supposedly little change. Note the slight decline up to 1900 - more later. It denies the very existence of the well-known Medieval Warm Period - see here (Monckton's 19 papers), here (Loehle's study with non-dendro proxies) here (CO2 Science), and here (67-page paper). The Hockey Stick was discredited by the Wegman Report to the US Government in 2006 as having "a validation skill not significantly different from zero". The midieval warm period and little ice age is missing in this graph. In Loehle 2008 it is there. It is a long tale, but well worth following. No one who reads it will ever again trust the IPCC or the “scientists” and environmental extremists who author its climate assessments. Monckton papers: http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/monckton/monckton_what_hockey_stick.pdf

(22-11-2023) Figure 5: Correlation between the cosmic ray flux reconstruction (based on the exposure ages of Iron meteorites) and the geochemically reconstructed tropical temperature. The comparison between the two reconstructions reveals the dominant role of cosmic rays and the galactic "geography" as a climate driver over geological time scales. (Shaviv & Vezier 2003)
Source: http://www.sciencebits.com/CosmicRaysClimate#MSJGR.

(22-11-2023) Source :R.A. Brenner 2001/C.R. Scotese. Let's go back to the beginning, with evidence of temperature and carbon dioxide levels from our fossil records. Here is a comparison of CO2 and temperature throughout Earth history. The present CO2 level (red) is a tiny fraction of what it has been in the past, even after life had blossomed. See how high CO2 has been. It didn't kill life then, and some of the animals alive then are still with us. See how temperature fluctuates (blue) between clear upper and lower limits. See how ancient CO2 doesn't correlate with temperature at all. So suddenly it does, now Hmmm... According some scientists the Faint Young Sun and ocean pH changing is missing in the graphic of Brenner 2001/Sootese and the theory of Lord Monckton Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpF48b6Lsbo I am studing it now. It did not convince me yet because of the higher temparatures 500 Million years ago in the Cambrium period of about 22 degrees Celsius and atmospheric CO2 levels of about 5000 -7000 ppm in the Brenner 2001 graphic. (Temperature after C.R. Sootese and CO2 after R.A. Berner,2001 which where put in one graphic)

The prove there is no consenses about CO2 and global warming

Ecology

(22-11-2023) Øko Solutions thinks that N(Nitrogen),  NO,  Phosphate (PO4 3−) and CO2 are not toxic substances or a pollutant what the media is telling many times but natural substances which are essential in the Ecology. Air contains 79% of N. With a higher temperature and a higher CO2 concentration(the 2 degree Celsius that is predicted by global warming) plants will grow harder. Plants will produce O2. This way the circle is round again. Øko Solutions does not subscribe the correlation between a higher CO2 and therefor a higher Temperature on earth and has other conclusions. The temperature is ahead of the CO2% with 800 years in the famous speech by Al Gore. Something he did not tell in his graphics of the last 300,000 years. CO2 follows Temperature and the famous “hockey stick graphic” of Michael Mann later was proven wrong. The cause never comes after the effect in science. Correlation also does not mean causation.  Cum hoc ergo propter hoc. His Nobel price he should bring back. The science certainly is not cristallised yet. In the Eocene period about 50 million years ago the earth was became 12 degrees Celsius warmer and the CO2% was going down in a period of 100 Million years. The earth was totaly icefree and most living species on earth did survived. Glaciers were formed about 30 Million years ago on Antartica and 3 Million years ago on the Northen hemispere. The earth is now at the end of a cooling period of 50 Million years. The earth is now in one of the coldest period of his history. This according dr Patrick Moore. The increase of the CO2% of 0,03%(300 ppm) to 0,04%(400 ppm) in the atmosphere the last 40 years is happening according Øko Solutions by cyclic influences, the burning of fuels, the absorption of the air from CO2 in the sea(cold sea water can take more CO2 than warm sea water, again the temperature as the most important factor!) and other unknown factors. Warming and cooling of the earth according Øko Solutions are happening under influence of the sun, the shifting angle of the earth in his axe towards to oval orbit around the sun.(The Milankovitch cycle), PDO’s (Pacific Decadal Oscillation) and AMO’s (Atlantic Multidecal Oscillation).  According Prof. Dr. Horst-Joachim Lüdecke solar cycles determine our climate.  Periods of the most known climate cycles in Temperatures [Years] are  130 Million (Svensmark),  100 000 (Milanković)  2300 (Halstat),  1000 (Eddy),  200 (de Vries/Suess),  90 (Gleis),  65 AMO/PDO. With Fourier Backtransformation they can be obtained from the data. Prof. Dr. Horst-Joachim Lüdecke predicts a cooling period but does not know when exactly. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUcaowPzUmI These and other unknown factors are causing the warming/cooling(ice ages) of the earth.  (26-08-2018) I made a rough calculation when the Antartic with an average icesheet of 2200 meter thick and the Artic with 1-4 meters thicknes will completely melt. The calculated sea levelrise calculated is 66 meter. Since the little Ice age the sea level has risen only 7 inches( 1 inche = 2,54 cm) in the last century. The rise is always constant! The sea level will probably rise about 6 inches until the year 2100 according Dr. Don Easterbrook. Another phenomenon is that when the Norh pole is decreasing the South pole is increasing. The South pole is growing 2x as hard as the melting of the North pole. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_WWXGGWZBE  The fine dust that is coming from engines with fossil fuels is probably more dangerous than the CO2 that this engine emits. This fine dust according Øko Solutions needs therfor to be captured very well. Also water vapor is a greenhouse gas but not many scientific institutions are mentioning this. The concentration of water vapor in the air is about 30,000 ppm. The Mollier diagram describes the correlation between the Relative Humidity and the Temperature.

(22-11-2023) Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HaU4kYk21Q Clouds are not a greenhouse gas! Clouds are not water vapour! Clouds are small water drops (1μm – 1mm). Waterdrops are continuing radiatiors (and absorbers).

(22-11-2023) How clouds work in the climate is in detail unknown until now. The biggest problem in climate research is seen in trying to parameter the clouds.(the Svensmark-effect) According Dipl . Metereologist Klaus-Eckart Puls is the first 20-50 ppm CO2 most important for only a few tenth degrees warming as a greenhouse gas. (0,3oC) With higher concentrations the effect is logarithmic to almost zero. With a higher temperature air can hold more water vapout and cause a positive effect in the temperature … but also a negative effect in the temperature! (More water vapour,more clouds and more rain) There is no water vapour increase in the air. For the last 18 years there is no warming. After 40 years (1973 -2007) of measurements from Radio Sondes in the Troposphere in almost all hights there was a decrease in the % of water vapour (a negative trend)! (Source: Garth Paltridge & Albert Arking & Michael Pook 2009) The long term water vapour feedback is negative [g/kg]! All computer models are wrong and to high in their predictions. Also the stratospheric water vapour concentrations measured with satelites decreased by about 10% from 2000-2009. It did slow the increase in global surface temperature in the period of 2000-2009. The did measured this. It was not a model! After a lot of measurements the maximum comes in the range of 0.2 ,  0.4 and 0.6 oC in the real atmosphere because of the range of water vapour and the clouds. In Germany from 1951 to 2000 was no more rain then else. There is no trend.(Deutschen Wetter Dienst) Almost not one journalist did understand that in climate models not only with CO2 but also watervapour is also included in the calculations! The water vapour feedback is not a proven scientific Hypothese. The climate models are wrong! The media is the only catastrofic factor.

(22-11-2023) The concentration of CO2 is only 400 ppm (This is negligible small towards water vapor). Even when the CO2% doubles from 0,04%(400 ppm) to 0,08%(800 ppm) in the air according Øko Solutions nothing will happen. The concentrations are so small. CO2 cannot be responsible for the warming of the earth. Also the correlation between CO2 and warming of the earth is never scientificly proven according Øko Solutions. (Note: The scientific information in this document or my website is not peer reviewed, there still can be mistakes in it. Please give me feedback about the language and grammar mistakes and also when you think something is not correct. I want to correct all mistakes later.)

(22-11-2023) IMPORTANT: According some scientists dr Patrick Moore was debunked and using the debating tacktic Gish Gallop. I did study this information and looked at the [28] points. In my opinion he is exageratating and yes using his own style to convince people but the science itself for me is still convincing. According Lord Monckton the optimum growth for plants is 1000 ppm. Source (minute 50:55) :  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ES94giMZeY4

(22-11-2023)  Patrick Moore used the graphic of R.A. Brenner 2001 for his theory. Other graphics with other opinions are circulating as well. I have no information dr Don Eastbrook was debunked. He is predicting a cooling period instead of a warming period in the future. I think every scientist makes errors and the errors do not mean their whole theory they present is wrong. I think we have to separte this in my opinion. The topic is  already very complex and there are a lot of adjustments, errors and interests about this topic. Finding the right scientific source and data is difficult. I did read the article where Don Easterbrook is  debunked but personally I did not find it very convicing. The links are:

https://skepticalscience.com/moore-2012.html and 

https://www.skepticalscience.com/don-easterbrook-heartland-distortion-of-reality.html

Monckton papers:  Hockey stick? What Hockey stick?

(22-11-2023) In laymen’s language, the present paper respectfully summarizes Steve McIntyre’s account of the systematically dishonest manner in which the “hockey-stick” graph falsely showing that today’s temperatures are warmer than those that prevailed during the medieval climate optimum was fabricated in 1998/9, adopted as the poster-child of climate panic by the IPCC in its 2001 climate assessment, and then retained in its 2007 assessment report despite having been demolished in the scientific literature. 

It is a long tale, but well worth following. No one who reads it will ever again trust the IPCC or the “scientists” and environmental extremists who author its climate assessments.

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/monckton/monckton_what_hockey_stick.pdf 

(22-11-2023) According some scientists the Faint Young Sun and ocean pH changing is missing in the graphic of Brenner 2001/Sootese and the theory of Lord Monckton Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpF48b6Lsbo I am studing it now. It did not convince me yet because of the higher temparatures 500 Million years ago in the Cambrium period of about 22 degrees Celsius and atmospheric CO2 levels of about 5000 -7000 ppm in the Brenner 2001 graphic. (Temperature after C.R. Sootese and CO2 after R.A. Berner,2001 which where put in one graphic). Also according some other scientist some other claims of Monckton are not correct. According some scientist the sun was 4-6% weaker in the Cambrium. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiZlBspV2-M  In this video where they debunk Patrick Moore they forgot to say that Temperature leads CO2 with 800 years in the graphics of about 300.000 years. See minute 5:33 Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XIpTqbLR5Y Therefor I think his theory is still standing. With the weed killer incident they play on the man and just want to destoy his reputation. Of course he knows this is poison. The IPCC hockey graph of the last 1000 years cannot be correct because the midieval warming period and the little ice age is missing. Loehle 2008 is the correct graphic! That is my conclusion. (When some of the above information is not correct, I will change it later. The topic is diffecult.) According Monckton it is better to adapt to the different climate changes instead trying to fix it.

(22-11-2023) It is sad the Climate and C02 debate is misused between the Right and the Left politicial parties. It should be a matter of both the Right and Left no matter what the outcome in neutral science is! It seems it is more political science than neutral science with only Left and the Right. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNafpG3KvbQ

(22-11-2023) Zie ENCLOSURE 143. In this article I explain why there is no correlation between CO2 and the surface Temperature on Earth. CO2 follows the Temperature! Ask this article for free by mail: wernerdevries@live.com  Professor C.O. Weiss: The Climate change is due to natural cycles. Source:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAELGs1kKsQ accessed 23/04/2019. Internet link of his publication:  https://www.clim-past.net/9/447/2013/cp-9-447-2013.pdf  accessed 23/04/2019. I think this scientist deserves the Nobel prize for Physics with his simple research on natural Temperature cycles on Earth.

(22-11-2023) In the biological agriculture the use of N(fertiliser) and Pesticides is not allowed. Øko Solutions is against the use of pesticides because this substances will come into the food chain and therefor can damage the health of the human being and animals.

(22-11-2023) Pesticides mostly have complex deviant structureformulas and are therefor damaging the health. Also the use of GMO’s and not good for the health of humans and animals. The body does not recognizes this food and with sort of built this wrong into the muscles and other organs. The chains are sort of “crooked” built into a human or animal. After 3 generations a GMO crop has recovered itself. (This is an unfounded scientific statement and I have to find out later the exact value of it, it is a difficult topic)

Making humans a multiplanetary species

(22-11-2023) Mars contains 96% of CO2 and there is water as well. Plants can create O2. Ecology is the science of how all living things are interrelated and how we are related to them) CO2 probably responsible for the existence of every living thing in the future on mars. It is a building block. Life easily can be created at mars. Getting there (and back) is more diffecult according Elon Musk (Earth contains about 0,04% of CO2 in the air) 06-02-2018 The Falcon Heavy had a succesfull testflight! People who say it cannot be done should not interupt those who are doing it (George Bernard Shaw).

Watch Elon Musk reveal SpaceX's most detailed plans to colonize Mars

(22-11-2023) CO2 and H2O can make through the sabbatier process CH4 and O2. On earth between 70 and 80 procent of the O2 is produced by algae in the oceans which is liquid. Øko Solutions thinks that some introduced algae, moss (to create soil from rocks) or very small plants or micro organism (anaerobic or aerobic) from earth can survive the low pressure, radiation and low temperatures on the ice or in the ground and this is in the long run a better way to produce O2 and this has to be the first step to create life on Mars before humans can adapt on the surface without protection. The second step has to be planting trees who can survive the cold climate and low pressure. With the trees more O2 will be released and a small atmosphere with pressure probably will be formed around Mars. Water can stay liquid and even some clouds of watervapor can be possible. With the small pressure probably between 0,5 and 1 bar and a higher temperature the human body probably just can survive for a short time without protection. The law of Boyle or Ideal gas law is on Mars the same as it is on earth. (P1x V1)/ T1 = (P2 x V2) / T2 = Constant = nR. (PV = nRT)(n=moleculaire mass, R=gasconstante). 4 Billion years ago earth did contain 95% CO2 and 3 % N. Mars contains 95% CO2 and 1,9% N. The temperature on Mars is about -140 °C (in the poolwinter) and til 20 °C (in the summer). Mars has seasons just as on earth but twice as long as on earth. Mars has about half the size of earth and has a Northpole (mainly water ice) and Southpole (mainly CO2 ice mixed with waterice. Just as earth is has a warm core! The pressure is about 0,006 bar(=6 hPa). This low pressure is a problem for the human body and also to keep the water liquid! Probably the human body can adapt to the gravity of 3,74 m/s2. Probably some introduced micro organism can survive the radiation and the low pressures on Mars. The pressure on earth is about 1,013 bar(1013 hPa). Mars has 2 moons. A marsyear is about 2 times as long as on earth (686 days). A day on mars is about 24 hours and 36 minutes and that is about the same as on earth. The gradient of mars towards his orbit is 24 degrees compared to earth 23,6 is about the same. The gravity on Mars is 3,74 m/s2 compared with earth 9,81 m/s2. The created pressure on mars needs to be at least 300 miliBar in order for a human to survive. (This is the pressure on the top of the Mount Everest and Humans just can survive this!)When some of the above information is wrong I will change it later (10-02-2018). People who say it cannot be done should not interupt those who are doing it (George Bernard Shaw).

(22-11-2023) In the stratosphere other factors are important. It is because of the O3 is absorbing the energy of the sun. Radiative exchange dominates the thermodynamics in the stratosphere. Convection is of secondary importance in the stratosphere.

Roadtrip to BMW Mars town - Where too much is just right

(22-11-2023) OIL AND GAS ARE INEXHAUSTIBLE According Professor Thomas Gold the writer of The deep hot biosphere, Fossil fuels are not fossil. Only peat is a fossil fuel. (an organic substance). Oil, gas and coal are formed under pressure and heat in condensate layers with certain micro organism. When oil or gas is pumped out they will refill. Not one oil or gas source is ever closed. They are inexhaustible. The reason why nobody this knows is the communication policy of the U.S.A. (minute 4:19: when they tell oil and gas are exhaustible, reglement it by state and tax it the price can go up and wind- and solar can be installed, they all agree on it who profits from it) Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwlvlYb9gNc
Erdöl-Knappheit, Klimawandel ALLES IST GELOGEN

At a certain pressure compared with a dept of 200 kilometer deep in the mantel of the earth in an experiment they did mix Calciumcarbonate, Ironoxide and Water and large amouts of Methane was formed. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lr42BP3wvOw
Freeman Dyson on Tommy Gold, hearing mechanism, and abiogenic oil.

Click on the following link, scroll down and download the above study: 

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wpah-De-Vries.

Lügen im Weltraum - Gerhard Wisnewski bei SteinZeit

(22-11-2023) Het Klimaatmodel 2023! Een computermodel of klimaatmodel kan nooit de werkelijkheid weergeven van ons klimaat daarom houden wij ons dan maar bij dit fictieve klimaatmodel 2023 waarvan dan niet bekend is op welke planeet zij zich bevind, wie zij is en hoe de planeten heten die wij nog meer op het plaatje kunnen zien. M.a.w. de geschetste situatie op het plaatje is science fiction. Het plaatje geeft net als andere computermodellen niet de realiteit weer ook al zijn de berekeningen nog zo goed en de plaatjes nog zo mooi. Adiabatic autocompressie is verantwoordelijk voor de temperatuur op aarde en planetary bodies met een dikke atmosfeer boven 0.1 bar. De 33 graden opwarming die steeds genoemd wordt zijnde veroorzaakt door het broeikas effect is onjuist. De term broeikaseffect is echt maar fysisch zeer onjuist en kan berekend worden met de ideale gaswet. die empirisch is vastgesteld na langere tijd aan de hand van vele experimenten. Verder hebben wij gewoon te maken met natuurlijke cyclussen verantwoordelijk voor de opwarming en afkoeling op aarde alsmede ook andere planeten met een druk hoger dan 0.1 bar. Wilt u het door mij gedane wetenschappelijke onderzoek ontvangen mail dan naar wernerdevries@live.com dan stuur ik u dit manuscript via de mail op.

Click on the following link, scroll down and download the above study: 

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wpah-De-Vries.

The off-gridd community in Paraguay you never heard of - a great plan B in Latin America.

(22-11-2023) We do not need to go to Mars anymore, we can stay on earth, see how this community solved all the problems we have in 2023. Paraguay applies a standard income tax rate of 10%. International icome is not taxed in  Paraguay.

Warmth in winter with only waxinelights.

(04-12-2023) With only 9 waxine lights you can warm up this livingroom in Heino, the Netherlands in winter up to 19 degrees Celcius. One waxine light did cost me 3 eurocents in 2022 so in the winter of 2022 this solution was much cheaper then heating with gas in Heino in the Netherlands. This means 3 hours of heating did cost me only 27 eurocents (that is 9 cents for 1 hour)and heating for a whole day, lets say 10 hours heating cost only 0.90 euro. The monthly cost of heating with gas was 221,00 euro since october 2022 (instead of the normal 74,00 euro a month in september 2022). This means heating for 31 days with waxine lights will cost me 18.60 euro. The amount of money saved in one month when using waxine light and normal showering is at least 150 euro a month in this specific case. The other cost and calculations are just a rough estimation. When you do this for 3 months your savings are at least 450 euro. I suggest we quit the contracts for gas delivery with foreign countries, we deliver very cheap gas to other countries and let people in the Netherland buy expensive gas prices. How stupid can our government be? In the Nothsea is plenty of gas. Let our goverment give this to the dutch population again, so we have cheap gas again. At date 01-01-2024 one kubiek meter gas will cost a consumer 1,44995 euro of which is 70.544 cent taxes. I think the tax can go down and also the normal costs when the gas is coming out of our own North sea. Vote for Het Landschap if you want cheap gas next time and more commen sense in our government. This heating solution works. I tested it myself. 

15 kW turbulent vortex turbine.

(08-01-2024) This is free energy when you are living next to a floating river and can provide many houses with energy. This is a solutions that works. 

The complete history of the Avogadro number.

(05-04-2024) The Avogadro number is 

I spent 90 days building, cooking and survival on a cliff.

(28-09-2024) He even made iron tools and a terra cotta pan.  With patience and determination you can creates things out of nature. 

Climategate's "hide the decline" is explaid by Berkeley professor Richard A. Muller

(20-10-2024) Use Mike"s trick, that means Michael Manns  trick to hide the decline from 1960 til now accordinge Berkeley professor Richard A Muller.

Living in a tent, how we stay undetected

(17-12-2024) Stay still in the woods when you do not want to be spotted, even if you are wearing a red jacket. This is how an owl stays undetected in daytime, they blend in to nature. Keep every noise as low as possible even coughing can blow up your undetected cover, when someone hears this, they know, someone is there.